New brain-computer interface allows man with ALS to ‘speak’ again (2024)

Neurological HealthAugust 14, 2024

By Nadine A Yehya

(SACRAMENTO)

A new brain-computer interface (BCI) developed at UC Davis Health translates brain signals into speech with up to 97% accuracy — the most accurate system of its kind.

The researchers implanted sensors in the brain of a man with severely impaired speech due to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The man was able to communicate his intended speech within minutes of activating the system.

A study about this work was published today in the New England Journal of Medicine.

New brain-computer interface allows man with ALS to ‘speak’ again (1)

ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig's disease, affects the nerve cells that control movement throughout the body. The disease leads to a gradual loss of the ability to stand, walk and use one’s hands. It can also cause a person to lose control of the muscles used to speak, leading to a loss of understandable speech.

The new technology is being developed to restore communication for people who can’t speak due to paralysis or neurological conditions like ALS. It can interpret brain signals when the user tries to speak and turns them into text that is ‘spoken’ aloud by the computer.

“Our BCI technology helped a man with paralysis to communicate with friends, families and caregivers,” said UC Davis neurosurgeon David Brandman. “Our paper demonstrates the most accurate speech neuroprosthesis (device) ever reported.”

Brandman is the co-principal investigator and co-senior author of this study. He is an assistant professor in the UC Davis Department of Neurological Surgery and co-director of the UC Davis Neuroprosthetics Lab.

The new BCI breaks the communication barrier

When someone tries to speak, the new BCI device transforms their brain activity into text on a computer screen. The computer can then read the text out loud.

To develop the system, the team enrolled Casey Harrell, a 45-year-old man with ALS, in the BrainGate clinical trial. At the time of his enrollment, Harrell had weakness in his arms and legs (tetraparesis). His speech was very hard to understand (dysarthria) and required others to help interpret for him.

In July 2023, Brandman implanted the investigational BCI device. He placed four microelectrode arrays into the left precentral gyrus, a brain region responsible for coordinating speech. The arrays are designed to record the brain activity from 256 cortical electrodes.

“We’re really detecting their attempt to move their muscles and talk,” explained neuroscientist Sergey Stavisky. Stavisky is an assistant professor in the Department of Neurological Surgery. He is the co-director of the UC Davis Neuroprosthetics Lab and co-principal investigator of the study. “We are recording from the part of the brain that’s trying to send these commands to the muscles. And we are basically listening into that, and we’re translating those patterns of brain activity into a phoneme — like a syllable or the unit of speech — and then the words they’re trying to say.”

New brain-computer interface allows man with ALS to ‘speak’ again (2)

Faster training, better results

Despite recent advances in BCI technology, efforts to enable communication have been slow and prone to errors. This is because the machine-learning programs that interpreted brain signals required a large amount of time and data to perform.

“Previous speech BCI systems had frequent word errors. This made it difficult for the user to be understood consistently and was a barrier to communication,” Brandman explained. “Our objective was to develop a system that empowered someone to be understood whenever they wanted to speak.”

Harrell used the system in both prompted and spontaneous conversational settings. In both cases, speech decoding happened in real time, with continuous system updates to keep it working accurately.

The decoded words were shown on a screen. Amazingly, they were read aloud in a voice that sounded like Harrell’s before he had ALS. The voice was composed using software trained with existing audio samples of his pre-ALS voice.

Watch Video

New Brain-Computer Interface Allows Man with ALS to 'Speak’ Again

At the first speech data training session, the system took 30 minutes to achieve 99.6% word accuracy with a 50-word vocabulary.

“The first time we tried the system, he cried with joy as the words he was trying to say correctly appeared on-screen. We all did,” Stavisky said.

In the second session, the size of the potential vocabulary increased to 125,000 words. With just an additional 1.4 hours of training data, the BCI achieved a 90.2% word accuracy with this greatly expanded vocabulary. After continued data collection, the BCI has maintained 97.5% accuracy.

New brain-computer interface allows man with ALS to ‘speak’ again (5)

The first time we tried the system, he cried with joy as the words he was trying to say correctly appeared on-screen. We all did.” neuroscientist Sergey Stavisky

“At this point, we can decode what Casey is trying to say correctly about 97% of the time, which is better than many commercially available smartphone applications that try to interpret a person’s voice,” Brandman said. “This technology is transformative because it provides hope for people who want to speak but can’t. I hope that technology like this speech BCI will help future patients speak with their family and friends.”

The study reports on 84 data collection sessions over 32 weeks. In total, Harrell used the speech BCI in self-paced conversations for over 248 hours to communicate in person and over video chat.

New brain-computer interface allows man with ALS to ‘speak’ again (6)

This technology is transformative because it provides hope for people who want to speak but can’t.” neurosurgeon David Brandman

“Not being able to communicate is so frustrating and demoralizing. It is like you are trapped,” Harrell said. “Something like this technology will help people back into life and society.”

“It has been immensely rewarding to see Casey regain his ability to speak with his family and friends through this technology,” said the study’s lead author, Nicholas Card. Card is a postdoctoral scholar in the UC Davis Department of Neurological Surgery.

New brain-computer interface allows man with ALS to ‘speak’ again (7)

Not being able to communicate is so frustrating and demoralizing. It is like you are trapped. Something like this technology will help people back into life and society.” Casey Harrell, patient with ALS and a participant in the BrainGate2 BCI trial

“Casey and our other BrainGate participants are truly extraordinary. They deserve tremendous credit for joining these early clinical trials. They do this not because they’re hoping to gain any personal benefit, but to help us develop a system that will restore communication and mobility for other people with paralysis,” said co-author and BrainGate trial sponsor-investigator Leigh Hochberg. Hochberg is a neurologist and neuroscientist at Massachusetts General Hospital, Brown University and the VA Providence Healthcare System.

Brandman is the site-responsible principal investigator of the BrainGate2 clinical trial. The trial is enrolling participants. To learn more about the study, visit braingate.org or contact braingate@ucdavis.edu.

A complete list of coauthors and funders is available in the article.

Caution: Investigational device. Limited by Federal law to investigational use.

Additional readings

  • Read the study
  • Neurological surgery researcher Sergey Stavisky and team awarded $3.5 million in grants
  • Clinical Trial Aims to Develop New Methods to Restore Speech with Brain-Computer Interface
  • Video
New brain-computer interface allows man with ALS to ‘speak’ again (2024)

FAQs

New brain-computer interface allows man with ALS to ‘speak’ again? ›

Casey Harrell has ALS and can't speak, but a new Brain-Computer Interface developed by researchers at UC Davis Health has let him communicate again. It works by reading his brain waves, then transforming them into words that the computer reads out loud. "Not being able to communicate is so frustrating and demoralizing.

Is the brain-computer interface real? ›

Brain-computer interfaces are devices that process brain activity and send signals to external software, allowing a user to control devices with their thoughts. With BCI technology, scientists envision a day when patients with paralysis, muscle atrophy and other conditions could regain motor functions.

How much does a brain-computer interface cost? ›

Although the initial costs of noninvasive BCI systems are relatively modest (eg, $5,000-$10,000), they too require some measure of ongoing technical support.

What is the brain-computer interface for communication? ›

A BCI is a communication system in which messages or commands that an individual sends to the external world do not pass through the brain's normal output pathways of peripheral nerves and muscles. For example, in an EEG-based BCI the messages are encoded in EEG activity.

Does Stephen Hawking use brain-computer interface? ›

Share. Not even Stephen Hawking used the kind of sci-fi communication interface that University of Kansas neuroscientist Jonathan Brumberg is developing. Hawking used a cheek muscle to control his voice device.

What are the side effects of brain-computer interface? ›

The implantation of invasive BCI devices carries inherent medical risks like infection or brain tissue damage. Even non-invasive techniques may pose health concerns, such as the effects of long-term exposure to electromagnetic fields. BCIs have also be shown to lead to high cognitive fatigue.

How close are we to the brain computer interface? ›

Amid ongoing human clinical trials, there is still a long way to go before neural chips are commonplace in clinics. It will potentially still take just under a decade for BCIs to reach market, but clinical trials are advancing quickly.

What is a brain-computer interface for disabilities? ›

Neuralink's brain chip: How brain-computer interfaces may revolutionise treatment for disabilities. Neuralink's first human trial has shown how brain-computer interface (BCI) technology can transform the lives of patients with disabilities, helping them become more independent.

What are some ethical concerns of using neural interfaces? ›

At the same time, neural interfaces raise critical ethical concerns over issues such as privacy, autonomy, human rights and equality of access.

Is a cochlear implant a brain-computer interface? ›

For example, the cochlear implant [12] is another form of BCI that provides artificial sensory inputs directly to the auditory system.

How many people have brain computer interfaces? ›

According to one leading BCI company, fewer than 40 people worldwide have implanted BCIs, all of them experimental. One of the main obstacles to BCI development is that each person generates unique brain signals. Another is the difficulty of measuring those signals.

Who is most likely to use brain computer interface? ›

Because of this, BCIs are being researched as a promising access technology for people with severe physical disabilities who have limited reliable control over their muscles and bodies. Using a BCI skips over the need to have voluntary control of your muscles to interact with devices around you.

Is it possible to connect your brain to a computer? ›

Its device uses electrocorticography-based BCI (ECoG). Electrodes in the form of metal discs are placed directly on the surface of the brain to receive signals. They connect wirelessly to a receiver, which in turn connects to a computer.

How accurate is the brain computer interface? ›

Of the studies testing a P300-based BCI for CRS-R assessment (n = 6), classification accuracy above chance ranged from 30.8% to 78.6% showing the ability of BCI to detect abilities not detected on behavioral CRS-R assessment.

Is whole brain emulation possible? ›

The technology for mapping and simulating an entire human brain is not currently available, but it is possible. This means that whole brain emulation likely is not a question of “if” but “when.” Therefore, it is imperative to discuss the ethics and potential ramifications of the technology before it is developed.

Is the brain really like a computer? ›

Perhaps a less misleading term is “computation.” The brain might not be a computer, because it is not literally programmable, and it might not literally run algorithms, but it certainly computes: for example, it can transform sound waves captured at the ears into the spatial position of a sound source.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Lidia Grady

Last Updated:

Views: 5856

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (65 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Lidia Grady

Birthday: 1992-01-22

Address: Suite 493 356 Dale Fall, New Wanda, RI 52485

Phone: +29914464387516

Job: Customer Engineer

Hobby: Cryptography, Writing, Dowsing, Stand-up comedy, Calligraphy, Web surfing, Ghost hunting

Introduction: My name is Lidia Grady, I am a thankful, fine, glamorous, lucky, lively, pleasant, shiny person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.